Skip to main content

Articles written by

Eileen Ariza

Cultural Influences on Critical Thinking: A Pedagogy for Educating Immigrant Preservice Teachers

There is no single definition of critical thinking, but there seems to be concurrence that it requires effective cognitive strategies to evaluate information and to draw conclusions based on reason. This article considers critical thinking as an inherent ability to engage in reasoned and reflective thinking on the contents of knowledge associated with educational psychology. The development of critical thinking abilities in preservice teachers who are either immigrants, or first-generation Americans raised in immigrant communities, is explored to gain an understanding of the effect of cultural influences on critical thinking in immigrant populations. Epistemic philosophical frameworks are identified to encompass McPeck’s critical thinking constructs and facilitate its infusion into pedagogical practices for educating immigrant preservice teachers. Further, the article examines the relationship between critical thinking abilities and cultural influences that shape ways of knowing, and discusses how immigrant or immigrant community preservice teachers might use cultural frameworks to critically analyse the tacit assumptions, beliefs, and practices embedded in the mainstream teacher education curriculum in countries such as the United States. To accomplish this connection, the authors recommend pedagogies (or androgogies for adult learners) that educators can infuse in the curriculum to foster critical thinking in the educational psychology discipline.
51 min read

Linguistic Mediation as Communicative Strategy in Malta: Empathy, Authority, and the Limits of Communicative Change

This qualitative study examines linguistic mediation as a professional and institutional practice within migration contexts, drawing on narrative data from a university-based mediation training initiative in Malta. While mediation is often framed as a neutral communicative tool that promotes empathy and inclusion, this study adopts a critical perspective, situating mediation within broader regimes of migration governance. Using thematic analysis of narrative data generated by public service professionals (n = 10), the study explores how participants reinterpret communication, authority, and engagement with migrants following structured, case-based pedagogical intervention. Findings indicate that mediation practices foster clarity, relationality, and professional reflexivity; however, these shifts may also function as forms of soft governance, rearticulating rather than transforming institutional power (Fassin, 2013; Foucault, 1991; Mezzadra & Neilson, 2019). The Maltese case illustrates how mediation can simultaneously enable inclusion and reinforce state frameworks of control. This study contributes to scholarship on intercultural communication, language policy, and migration governance by critically examining mediation as both a pedagogical and governance technology, while documenting how a structured professional training initiative can reframe institutional authority through the twin imperatives of empathy and civic responsibility.
17 min read